Aboriginal law Canada

Inuit using land claims agreements to address the environmental challenges

Could you kindly rephrase that in equivocal, inaccurate, vague, self-serving and roundabout terms we can all understand?

In the midst of grappling with the impact of global warming on the Arctic, with a seemingly growing list of nations laying competing claims to maritime access to the Northwest Passage and the riches lying beneath the forbidding landscape, the Inuit are turning towards land claims agreements reached with the Government of Canada to address the environmental challenges faced by their communities.

Faced with a way of life under siege, the Inuit have already begun testing the flexibility and fluidity of northern land claims agreements, having filed a $1-billion suit against the federal government in what may be a foreshadow of long drawn-out legal battles spurred in part by shifting environmental and climatic changes in the north.

In a suit that will put to test competing visions of the interpretation and nature of land claims agreements, the  Nunavut Tunngavik Inc (NTI) filed a statement of claim against the Attorney General of Canada nearly four years ago for breach of contract, alleging that the federal government failed to live up to its obligations and has  therefore violated the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement Act, S.C. 1993, c.29 (Agreement). The Agreement identified the geographical area of the Northwest Territories as the Nunavut Settlement Area, and on April 1, 1999 the area became the Territory of Nunavut. NTI, a body established to assist in the implementation of the land claims agreement negotiated by the Inuit and the Government of Canada, coordinates and manages Inuit responsibilities set out in the Agreement while ensuring that the federal and territorial governments fulfill their obligations.

“Land claims agreements are the sole legal defence against the Canadian state or any other state that is making certain claims in this part of the world,” observed Konstantia Koutouki, a law professor at the Université de Montréal, Faculty of Law, who examined the issue of Inuit perceptions on the adaptability of land claims agreements to accommodate environmental change. “This legal agreement becomes something very important when the rules of the game change or the number of players change.”

While the specific claims in the NTI suit, which is now at the stage of discovery, does not specifically make reference to climate change, an interpretative approach is being advocated by the Inuit that will open the door to delve into the issue, said Dougald Brown, of Nelligan O’Brien Payne in Ottawa, who is representing NTI. Under the Agreement, the federal government was required to establish a Nunavut Wildlife Management Board that would implement and monitoring plan to oversee ecosystemic and social changes. That was never done, said Brown, who practices labour and aboriginal law.

“Certainly part of the argument in the lawsuit is that not only it ought to have done to comply with the specific obligations of the Agreement, but it was critically important to serve a broader public interest because of the impact of climate change in the Arctic,” said Brown, co-author of Oil Under the Ice, a book dealing with oil exploration in the Arctic.

Numerous other breaches are also alleged, including inadequate funding for various boards, organizations, and commissions recognized or created under the Agreement with specific statutory responsibilities to monitor, plan and regulate land development, among other things. “One of the things that those various agencies are concerned with, at least indirectly, is climate change and the impact of climate changes in the North,” added Brown, who has worked with national Inuit organizations on land claims and other aboriginal and northern issues.

It remains to be seen, though, whether the court will embrace the view long espoused by the Inuit who view land claims agreements as working documents, which can and should be adaptable to changing circumstances in the North, said Koutouki, who spent two years examining the issue for a paper that she co-wrote with archeology professor Natasha Lyons of Simon Fraser University. Regarded as far more than “just a legal document,” the Inuit perceive land claim agreements as a flexible and forward-looking document that has empowered them to improve their lives by enabling them to assert control over their lands, resources and ways of life, added Koutouki.

Land claims agreements have taken on added significance over the past few years due to the pace and impact of climate change. Melting glaciers and permafrost, shorter winters, longer summers, and changing wildlife patterns are threatening the traditional Inuit way of life, a life closely connected to the land and its resources. As underscored by a report penned by Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, a national Inuit organization in Canada, the Inuit are “going to have to find new ways to make a living from the land, and whatever form that takes, it will not be what Inuit would have wished for, it will not be ideal.” Land claims agreements, however, can be the “building blocks” to develop and implement strategies to address the challenges posed by climate change, said Koutouki.

“How you view this instrument plays a role on what you think it can or can’t resolve,” notes Koutouki. “These agreements are seen as an important vehicle for community mobilization given the fact that the Inuit are powerless to control the activities that propel climate change. They perceive these legal texts as flexible and evolving structures that facilitate communication and negotiation between their communities and the government.”

Franklin Gertler, a Montreal environmental and aboriginal lawyer, believes that the Inuit’s position on land claims agreement may be on solid footing. While case law to some extent gives credence to the view held by federal and provincial governments that these agreements should be strictly interpreted, Gertler points out there is another current in law, particularly in international law, that holds that land claims agreements should be flexible in order to take into account a change of circumstances. In this case, climate change.

“Under international law there is an increasing recognition of rights of people to territories, a way of life and self-governance,” said Gertler. “If there are environmental threats that endanger the carrying-on of those ways of life, then it potentially becomes an international legal issue.”

You Might Also Like

No Comments

Thoughts?