Pinned

Quebec bill grants protections and establishes new obligations to de facto unions

A new proposed Quebec legal framework for common-law couples who become parents after June 2025 will be entrusted with new rights and obligations, and benefit from some protections granted to married couples, a development viewed by family law experts as a step in the right direction. But Bill 56, aimed at providing a better safety net for children, falls short on several levels.

Other

Right to data portability in effect in Quebec

Organizations doing business in Quebec face new compliance obligations as the right to data portability came into force at the tail end of September, spelling the end of a one-year leniency period following the entry into force of Quebec’s sweeping overhaul of its privacy regime.

Supreme Court will hear Quebec’s challenge to daycare access for asylum seekers

The nation's highest court agreed to hear a challenge from the Quebec government that granted asylum seekers access to subsidized daycare spaces.

Appeal Court deems universal life insurance policy is not income from property

In a decision expected by tax pundits to set a precedent, the Quebec taxman partially lost a legal battle after the Court of Appeal held that coverage provided by a universal life insurance policy does not constitute income from property even though it is a benefit for the insured taxpayer.

In about-turn, Quebec introduces bill that imposes moratorium on certain types of evictions

Facing growing pressure, Quebec tabled a bill that would impose a three-year moratorium on certain types of evictions and increase protections for low-income senior renters.

Insurance suicide exclusion null and void, rules Quebec Appeal Court

Insurers must clearly indicate exclusions or clauses, particularly clauses dealing with suicide, that reduce coverage under an appropriate heading or risk having the exclusion clause declared null and void, ruled the Quebec Court of Appeal.

Quebec law society disbars 84 lawyers

A staggering 84 lawyers have been disbarred by the Board of Directors of the Barreau du Québec.

Class actions over COVID-19 certified against Google and Facebook

Two separate but related class actions were recently certified by Quebec Superior Court against tech behemoths Google and Meta for allegedly breaching Quebecers' freedom of expression by censoring or making content directly or indirectly related to COVID-19 unaccessible.

Law schools falls short of preparing students for practice, survey says

Law schools falls short of preparing students for practice, survey says.

McGill law professors on strike

McGill law professors, asserting that the university is negotiating in bad faith, began an unlimited strike two days ago, demanding better pay and working conditions, a halt towards the growing inclination towards centralization at the university, and the safeguarding of collegial governance at the faculty level.

Quebec looking at electronic surveillance of offenders serving conditional sentences

Nearly two years after the Quebec became the first jurisdiction in the country to introduce an electronic tracking system to thwart intimate partner violence, the provincial government is now considering the possibility of remotely following offenders serving sentences in the community.

Soccer club did not discriminate by refusing to integrate girls into a boys’ team

A Montreal soccer club did not discriminate by refusing to integrate two girls into a boys' team, ruled the Quebec Court of Appeal.

Sentenced reduced after trial judge gave inadequate reasons

19 May 2018 / by Luis Millán

A 25-year old Quebecer who was sentenced to a 12-month prison sentence and 18 month’s probation after being found guilty of sexual interference had his sentenced reduced after the Quebec Court of Appeal held that the trial judge gave insufficient reasons during sentencing.

In a ruling that underscores the importance for a trial judge to provide reasons, the Quebec appeal court held a judge may not, ex cathedra (from the chair), state that a sentence is reasonable.

Alexandre St-Cyr, 19 years old at the time of his offense, was found guilty by Court of Quebec Judge Michel Mercier on June 2016 of touching a 14-year old for a sexual purpose – what is referred to under s. 151 of the Criminal Code as sexual interference.

St-Cyr appealed the sentence, asserting that the judge failed to rule on the argument that the minimum sentence is cruel and unusual and that he gave insufficient reasons for the sentence.
The appeal court gave him reason, holding that the trial judge’s decision did not comply with the duty to give reasons, imposed by both case law and s. 726.2 of the Criminal Code. “There was no analysis of the mitigating and aggravating factors considered by the judge to find that a 12-month prison sentence was appropriate,” held the appeal court in a unanimous decision in St-Cyr c. R., 2018 QCCA 768.

Moreover, the appeal court held that a judge may avoid ruling on a question of constitutional validity or more specifically, on the minimum sentence when determining that the alleged violation does not apply to the case being heard. But a judge cannot set aside the debate to avoid the task of ruling on a constitutional question.

“Given that the judge implied that he would have imposed a lighter sentence than the minimum one, but for the law, the judicial exercise required for him to set aside the constitutional argument had to be reasoned, which it was not,” added the appeal court.

St-Cyr was handed a 90-day prison sentence to be serve intermittently and an 18-month supervised probation “given the objectives of deterrence and denunciation.”

Sentenced reduced after trial judge gave inadequate reasons

Share this post:

Leave a Reply Cancel reply