Law in Quebec

News about Quebec legal developments


Judiciary

  • Quebec Court of Appeal sanctions judge

    A Quebec judge who refused to hear a quarrel between neighbours and emphatically insisted that they negotiate a settlement before adjourning without cause a hearing over which he should have presided the same day has been sanctioned by the Quebec Court of Appeal.

    The 66-page ruling in Bradley (Re), 2018 QCCA 1145 reveals the need for the Quebec government to increase options available to the appellate court and the Quebec Judicial Council to deal with judicial misconduct of a provincially appointed judge, and for the council itself to enact changes to enhance procedural fairness, according to judicial ethics experts.

    (more…)

  • Quebec appeal court rebukes trial judge over stereotypical attitudes towards sexual assault

    The Quebec Court of Appeal admonished a trial judge who acquitted a father accused of incest for holding biases and stereotypes over the way a sexual assault victim should behave.

    The appellate court, in a brief but unusually blunt and forceful six-page ruling, ordered a new trial against a father who allegedly assaulted his daughter for a 16-year period, from the age of nine until 25. She came forward in 2010 when she was an adult and while living with her parents.

    (more…)

  • Court of Quebec judge absolved by inquiry committee

    A Court of Quebec judge under fire for allegedly lending more than $9 million in loans over the past few years has been absolved of any ethical breaches by a five-member panel of the Committee of Inquiry of the Conseil de la magistrature du Québec.

    The inquiry committee concluded that Judge Manlio Del Negro, nominated as a Court of Quebec judge on March 2017, did not infringe article 129 of the Quebec Courts of Justice Act nor did he breach the Quebec Judicial Code of Ethics. Under article 129 of the Act, the office of judge is exclusive. In other words, a lawyer appointed judge is legally required to refrain from any activity which is not compatible with his functions, including carrying out – even indirectly — commercial activities.

    (more…)

  • Quebec Superior Court judges launch suit against governments

    In an extraordinary development at a time when the justice system in Quebec is grappling with the after-effects of the landmark Jordan ruling, Quebec Superior Court judges have launched a suit against the federal and provincial government over the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Quebec in some civil matters.

    (more…)

  • Allegations of conflict of interest against three judges dismissed

    The Canadian Judicial Council has dismissed allegations of conflicts by three judges who attended privately sponsored receptions or conferences.

    The three judges, all of whom hear tax cases, landed in hot water after the CBC and Radio-Canada reported that they had attended social events at an International Fiscal Association Conference in Madrid in September 2016. The conference was approved by the CJC as a continuing education opportunity for judges involved in tax law matters.

    (more…)

  • Court of Quebec Judge acted as a private lender before being appointed

    A recently appointed Court of Quebec judge has lent more than $9 million in loans over the past few years, according to an investigation by a French-language newspaper.

    Judge Manlio Del Negro, who was formally inducted as a Court of Quebec judge yesterday during a ceremony held at the Montreal courthouse, allegedly provided more than 45 loans from 2006 to 2017 before being appointed as a judge this spring, according to the Journal de Montréal.

    (more…)

  • Quebec government appoints three new judges

    The Quebec government is ramping its judicial appointments to ease the growing backlog of cases in the justice system.

    (more…)

  • Quebec judge may be a step closer to being removed from the bench

    A Quebec judge who refused to hear a quarrel between neighbours and emphatically insisted that they negotiate a settlement may be a step closer to being removed from the bench after the Quebec Court of Appeal announced it will launch an inquiry on his conduct following a request by the Quebec Minister of Justice Stephanie Vallée. (more…)

  • Request for recusal highlights need for judicial guidelines over social media

    A Quebec judge who was asked by defence lawyers to recuse herself from presiding over a multi-defendant drug trial because many of her “friends” on Facebook are Crown prosecutors highlights the need for a comprehensive guideline to help judges navigate the world of social media and developing technologies, assert legal observers. (more…)

  • Judge convicted of first degree murder remains in jail

    Retired judge Jacques Delisle, hoping to become the second person in Quebec in thirty years to be released pending an appeal, will have to remain in jail after Quebec Court of Appeal Justice Richard Wagner ruled that releasing him could undermine the public’s faith in the justice system.

    Delisle, believed to be the first Canadian judge to ever stand trial for murder, was found guilty last month of first-degree murder in the death of his invalid wife by an eight-man, four-woman jury after three days of deliberations. The 77-year-old retired judge, who automatically received a sentence of life in prison, with no possibility of parole for 25 years, plead before the Quebec Court of Appeal that he should be released pending an appeal because he was having a tough time in prison due to his advanced age and the position he held in society.

    Under s.679 (3) of the Criminal Code an appellant may be released pending the determination of his appeal if the appellant establishes that the appeal or application for leave to appeal is not frivolous, if he would surrender himself into custody in accordance with the terms of the order, and if his detention was not necessary in the public interest.

    In a 13-page ruling, Justice Wagner found that Delisle’s application for leave to appeal was not frivolous nor did he pose a flight danger. But Judge Wagner found that a public, knowledgeable about the justice system and the circumstances surrounding the case, would risk losing confidence in the criminal and penal system if “I acquiesced to the demand made by the appellant.”

    “The appellant was found guilty by 12 persons, impartial and independent, of committing one of the most serious crimes sanctioned by the Criminal Code,” wrote Justice Wagner, who was appointed to the Quebec Court of Appeal bench two years after Delisle retired. ”It consisted of a premeditated murder with obvious violence on a vulnerable person. The appellant must establish very serious grounds for appeal to justify, in light of the circumstances surrounding this case, his release. This demonstration was not made.”

  • Another labour dispute strikes Quebec’s justice system

    The list of actors in the Quebec justice system who have grievances against the Quebec government continues to flourish.

    Judges sitting on the (TAQ), a specialized court that deals with administrative decisions, recently walked out for a few hours after labour negotiations with the government reached an impasse. In early May, nine of ten coordinating judges, responsible for ensuring rapid and efficient processing of the proceedings, resigned from their administrative duties.

    (more…)

  • Committee recommends a modest salary increase for Quebec judges

    Days before the Quebec government enacted a contentious back-to-work legislation to end an acrimonious labour standoff with its Crown prosecutors and government lawyers, a judicial compensation committee released an inconspicuous report that will likely once again test the government’s rapport with the principle players of the legal system.

    A five-member blue-ribbon panel of legal and financial experts established under the Courts of Justice Act (Act) recommended handing Court of Quebec judges, municipal judges and justices of the peace a modest hike in their remuneration package, but it would be surprising if the provincial government embraces the recommendations, given past history.

    (more…)

  • New interim rules over judicial nomination given tepid praise

    A series of new interim rules introduced by the Quebec government to tighten the judicial nomination and selection process has drawn lukewarm praise, not in the least because it fails to rein in the discretionary powers of the Premier and the Minister of Justice even though the Bastarache commission warned that the process was open to possible political interference.

    In late January, the Bastarache commission made sweeping recommendations to address “several weaknesses” in the Quebec judicial selection and appointment process “vulnerable to all manner of interventions and influence.”

    The new interim rules, described by legal insiders as a “step in the right direction,” makes a few minor changes to the judicial selection and appointment process, notably prohibiting political staff who work for the Minister of Justice and the Premier’s office from taking part in the process.

    (more…)

  • Bastarache commission: Respected counsel caught in the maelstrom

    The lead counsel who resigned from the Bastarache Commission after being caught in a maelstrom that raised doubts over his impartiality “deeply regrets” missing the opportunity to leave at the twilight of his career his imprimatur on the inquiry into alleged political interference in the nomination of judges.

    Barely a week after being appointed as the chief prosecutor by former Supreme Court justice Michel Bastarache, Quebec City lawyer Pierre Cimon bitterly submitted his resignation after becoming the target of intense scrutiny from the media and opposition in the legislature following revelations that he had regularly contributed to the Quebec Liberal Party. Between 2002 and 2007, Cimon made five donations ranging from $250 to $500 – far less than what he gives to the Barreau du Québec’s Foundation or his local parish.

    “I donate to the local parish even though I am not a churchgoer,” said Cimon. “I donate because I believe churches play an important social role. It doesn’t mean that I practice and believe in the church’s dogma or agree with Cardinal Marc Ouellet’s position that abortion should be criminalized. The same holds true for the donations I made to the Liberals. I am a federalist, and that was the only place I could donate.”

    (more…)

  • The art of writing judgments

    When the Associate Chief Justice of the Quebec Superior Court André Wery was nominated to the bench in 1997, he considered he knew how to write well. Admitted to the Quebec Bar in 1975, he practiced for nearly 23 years in general and commercial litigation at the firm Desjardins Ducharme, and felt that he had honed his skills by writing hundreds of opinions and just as many briefs. “I must admit that I had quite a bit of confidence in my talent to write law,” admitted Justice Wery before a packed audience.

    But shortly after being nominated, the chief justice handed Judge Wery a bunch of documents including a small handbook entitled “Ēcrire la decision” (Writing judgments). Penned by Louise Mailhot, a lawyer who served as a Quebec Superior Court judge and then for a nine-year spell from 1987 to 2006 served on the Quebec Court of Appeal, the handbook has become “a must-have” for judges writing judgments, says Wery.

    While leafing through the handbook, “I began to hold doubts about the way I wrote,” said Wery “The more I read this small book, the more I doubted myself. Up to them I took great care in using abstruse expressions, the most abstruse possible. Probably because in a subliminal way I was trying to justify the fabulous fees that I was charging my clients, saying to myself that if the client doesn’t understand it then the client would say to himself it must be worth the price I’m paying.”

    Judge Wery then realized that he basically had to “start from zero,” and learn how to write again, an exercise he begun by asking himself who was he writing for. “Who we write for determines how we do it, what words we choose and the style we choose,” observed Justice Wery.

Law in Quebec
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.