Law in Quebec

News about Quebec legal developments


Class actions

  • Quebec Consumer Protection Act does not apply to sale of prescription drugs, rules appeal court

    In a resounding victory for the pharmaceutical industry, the Quebec Court of Appeal held that the province’s consumer protection law does not apply to the sale of prescription drugs, jettisoning a legal avenue a growing number of class action plaintiffs were using to sue the industry.

    In what has been described as a landmark ruling by experts, the Quebec appeal court examined for the first time the merits of a class action regarding a drug manufacturer’s duty to warn. In dismissing a class action that alleged that Abbott Laboratories Inc. failed to provide sufficient information over the risks of a prescription drug, the appeal court provided critical guidance on the liability regime in Quebec for drug manufacturers facing product liability claims, confirmed for the first time the applicability of the learned intermediary doctrine in the province, and held that compliance with regulatory standards tends to indicate that drug manufacturers fulfilled its obligation to provide adequate information.

    (more…)

  • Quebec judge certifies class-action lawsuit against Just for Laughs founder Gilbert Rozon

    A class action launched by 20 women who allege they were sexually assaulted or harassed by the founder of Just for Laughs was certified by Quebec Superior Court.

    In a 36-page ruling, Quebec Superior Justice Donald Bisson highlighted that class actions have “shown their value” in sexual assault cases because they have allowed “hundreds of victims” access to justice.

    “If the plaintiff was not authorized to file the current class action, it is highly likely that many victims would be deprived of their ability to exercise their rights,” said Justice Bisson in Les Courageuses c. Rochon 2018 QCCS 2089. A class action “like this one allows all victims to understand that they are not alone, that the assaults are not their fault and that if they have the courage to come forward to denounce the sexual abuse committed against them, they will make the versions of the other victims more likely.”

    Gilbert Rozon, also the subject of a criminal investigation, has denied the allegations. He unsuccessfully argued that “the fact of being charming while using his power was not in itself a fault,” that it was necessary to question “the consent of the alleged victims which happens in their heads and for which Rozon is not responsible,” and that the class representative — Patricia Tuslane, the only one to publicly come forward – did not offer material evidence to buttress her allegations.

    The class action is seeking up to $400,000 in moral damages for each individual complainant, and a total of $10 million for the group in punitive damages.

  • Videotron wins a partial victory in class action suit

    A Quebec telecommunications giant won a partial victory after the Quebec Court of Appeal reduced the amount of punitive damages it was ordered to pay in a class action suit from $1 million to $200,000.

    (more…)

  • National class action against Air Canada by former Aveos employees certified

    Former employees of Air Canada’s overhaul maintenance centers have been given the green light to proceed with a national class action against the nation’s biggest airliner.

    Aveos, a former subsidiary of Air Canada until the company’s insolvency in March 2012, employed 1,800 people that worked at the airline’s overhaul and maintenance centers in Montreal, Winnipeg and Mississauga.

    The class action seeks compensation for Aveos’ former employees, a figure that could rise up to $100 million, according to Trudel Johnston & Lesperance LLP, the Montreal law firm behind the class action.

    Class action representative Gilbert McMullen alleges a violation of the Air Canada Public Participation Act. Until amended by Parliament in June of 2016, the Act required Air Canada to operate maintenance and overhaul centers in Winnipeg, Mississauga and in Montreal. Previous decisions by Quebec Superior Court and a five-member panel of the Quebec Court of Appeal unanimously concluded that Air Canada had breached the Act.

    The class action also alleges that Air Canada acted in bad faith, including by deliberately provoking the collapse of Aveos, an issue that may give rise to punitive damages.

    “The Court considers that Mr. McMullen has demonstrated a serious colour of right,” said Quebec Superior Court Justice Jean-François Michaud in a 27-page ruling in McCullen c. Air Canada. “The allegations of violation of the Act are supported by the chronology of events and reveal that Air Canada has significantly reduced maintenance and overhaul activities at the Centers. These facts were found by Castonguay J. and the Court of Appeal.”

    Categories: ,
  • Retailer ordered to pay $1 million in punitive damages in class action

    Canada’s largest discount furniture and appliance retailer was ordered to pay $2.36 million, including $1 million in punitive damages, to thousands of consumers after Quebec Superior Court found that it engaged in deceptive advertising and marketing with its popular “buy now, pay later” promotions.

    The ruling, one of a handful of Quebec class actions that was decided on its merits, represents a convincing victory for consumer’s rights and serves as a cautionary tale for business that rely on false and misleading advertising pitches to lure customers, according to legal experts.

    (more…)

  • Two separate class action suits launched against German carmakers alleging collusion

    Days after the German news magazine Der Spiegel reported that for two decades more than 200 managers and engineers of three large German automakers met in 60 different task forces to secretly coordinate the “development of cars, costs, suppliers, and markets,” back-to-back class action lawsuits were launched in Quebec and Ontario.

    (more…)

  • Bell Canada facing yet another class action

    Barely a week after Bell Canada’s wireless provider was compelled to pay $1.6 million to some 76,000 clients who paid excessive cancellation fees after the Supreme Court of Canada refused to hear its appeal, the telecommunication giant now faces another potentially costly legal battle after Quebec Superior Court authorized a class action over fee increases on internet, mobile, telephone, television services.

    (more…)

  • Telecom giants must pay millions following SCC’s refusal to hear appeals

    Telecommunication giants Bell Mobility and Rogers Communications must pay millions of dollars to clients who paid excessive cancellation fees after the Supreme Court of Canada refused to hear their appeals.

    (more…)

  • Court approves $2.5 million class action settlement agreement involving hockey coach

    A $2.5 million class action settlement agreement reached between the victims of a former hockey coach and his employer, the City of Westmount, was approved by a Superior Court judge.

    (more…)

  • Quebec telecom company ordered to pay more than $3 million in punitive damages

    A Quebec telecommunications firm, Vidéotron Inc., has been ordered to pay more than $3 million in punitive damages to consumers who were charged extra when the Internet service provider unilaterally modified the terms of their so-called “Extreme High Speed” service, held the Quebec Court of Appeal.

    In a decision that examines the scope of contractual obligations, the appeal court held that a unilateral modification clause contained in the contract did not authorize Vidéotron to impose fees that “had not been agreed to in the initial contract or to modify goods and services described” in the contract. The unilateral clause in this case would have meant that consumers waived their rights conferred by sections 12 and 40 of the Quebec Consumer Protection Act (Act) – and that is prohibited by sections 261 and 262 of the Act.

    (more…)

  • Monetizing data, without consent

    You can still download the application if you want. But if you believe what Kyle Zak has to say about it, it’s not something you would do. Not unless you don’t mind the trade-off between ease-of-use and the reams of information you will allegedly provide to the popular audio maker Bose Corp.

    (more…)

  • Court certifies class action regarding misclassification of lawyers as independent contractors

    In a decision that underlines the changing employment landscape, a class action against Deloitte LLP involving document reviewers has been certified by an Ontario court.

    (more…)

  • Class action against Bell certified

    Joey Zukran is a busy man. The Montreal lawyer who spearheaded a class action over photo radar tickets following a series of decisions that have put thousands of tickets in jeopardy after the courts called into question the rules around the province’s use of the automated speed and red-light enforcement technology is at again.

    This time, he has Bell Canada in his sights. Zukran has launched a class action on behalf of Montreal resident Shay Abicidan that alleges that the largest telecommunications firm in the country is misleading customers that its high-speed internet service delivers a fibre optic network to homes.

    The class action, certified yesterday by Quebec Superior Court Daniel Bisson, alleges that the company has falsely advertised its Fibe television and Internet service. An Internet-based television service, Bell Fibe uses a fibre optic internet network to connect to homes. In many cases however the fibre optic wiring is sent to a neighborhood node which in turn is connected to residential homes through copper phone wires. The class alleges that Bell is misrepresenting its adverstisements, in violation of article 41 of the Quebec Consumer Protection Act.

    Compensatory and punitive damages in amounts have yet to be determined.

  • Photo radar under the gun in Quebec

    Photo radar tickets are under the gun in Quebec, following a series of decisions that have put thousands of tickets in jeopardy after the courts called into question the rules around the province’s use of the automated speed and red-light enforcement technology.

    The fallout from the precedent-setting decision that held that evidence from the current photo system is “inadmissible” and “illegal” is already beginning to be felt at a time when Quebec is increasing the number of photo radar sites. Shortly after the landmark ruling issued in late November by Judge Serge Cimon of the Court of Quebec, another Court of Quebec judge heeded his guidance and tossed out 422 photo radar tickets. More recently still, two Montreal lawyers have filed two separate motions seeking authorization for class action lawsuits against the Quebec government to have hundreds of thousands of speeding and red-light tickets issued with photo radar evidence thrown out or refunded.

    (more…)

  • Quebec appeal court sets high bar for leave to appeal in class action certification cases

    The Quebec Court of Appeal upheld a ruling that certified a class-action lawsuit following an outbreak of Legionnaires’ disease in Quebec City in 2012 that is believed to have contributed to 14 deaths and lead 181 others to become ill from bacteria found to be in a cooling tower of a downtown office building.

    (more…)

Law in Quebec
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.